Maritime Union of Australia 27 Sep 2001
But now widows of Australian waterside workers killed by exposure
to asbestos will benefit from a breakthrough settlement for 11
women in Melbourne this August.
The settlement recognises the economic value of the work their
husbands did at home.
Previously a widow's claim was not viable if her husband died
over the age of 65 or earlier, unless he was working at the time
of diagnosis. This was because compensation for dependents under
Victorian law was in part based on their earnings at the time.
Eleven women - one in Canada, one in Queensland and nine in Melbourne
sued the federal government body Stevedoring Industry Finance
Committee, James Hardie and CSR.
The defendants settled the cases out of court. The decision is
a result of the union's long campaign on behalf of members and
their families stricken by asbestos disease.
Lawyer Suzanne Sandford of Slater and Gordon says the decision
is a breakthrough for hundreds of women who have suffered hardship
since their husbands died, some for as long as 20 years .
"Until these cases, the courts and the defendants had not recognised
the substantial contribution that non working men make at home
- mowing lawns, home maintenance, driving, painting, gardening,"
she said.
"Since their husbands' deaths, many of the widows have seen their
houses fall into disrepair because they cannot manage them alone,
or because they are under financial strain having to pay others
to do the work their husbands previously did.
"This contribution was substantial. According to the Australian
Bureau of Statistics, men over 65 spend an average of 19.5 hours
per week on domestic services.
"Now the widows of waterside workers whose lives were tragically
shortened by dangerous workplace conditions will not suffer further
hardship after prematurely losing their husbands."
PHOTOS: Phoebe Lenehan, Dot Stanvi and Norma Honeyman toast their
win (top). Mrs Honeyman and her late husband Billy (above). Main
photo: David Caird, courtesy NEWSPIX