Howard's Falkland War
By Maritime Union of Australia
PM John Howard's action against Norwegian freighter & asylum seekers
amounts to an act of war, a breach of maritime law &, ultimately,
a cynical re-election ploy
 |
| PHOTO: Grant Turner, The Sun Herald |
GLEBE ISLAND 8, September 1: The Australian crew of the Norwegian
flagged Enterprise hold a meeting of ratings, officers and master.
Word has reached them that the Norwegian fleet worldwide are flying
their flags at half mast. They agree to do likewise as the vessel
sails out of Sydney and on to Newcastle, Port Kembla and Hobart.
"It is in mourning for all the people who could now die at sea
because of the actions of PM John Howard," said bosun Terry Munday.
It was a fitting protest against the Australian Government's cynical
contempt of maritime law all for political gain in the lead up
to a federal election.
The saga began in the Indian Ocean 150 kilometres north of Christmas
Island on August 26. An SOS from a sinking ship. Search and rescue
authorities in Australia pick up the message spelt out on the
deck of a wooden boat during a routine flight. Coastguard broadcasts
the May Day to all vessels in the region. True to maritime tradition
and the law of the sea the Captain Arnie Rinnan master of the
Norwegian ro-ro Tampa, on route from Fremantle to Singapore takes
the call.
With more than 12 centuries of maritime history in his veins and
45 years as a mariner all the the Norwegian master's instincts
and maritime wisdom led him to change course, without reservation,
and rescue the men, women and children from certain death. His
second instinct was to head for shore. Duty bound he headed for
the nearest port - Christmas Island.
This was no ordinary rescue. A crew of 27 successfully helping
440 exhausted men, women and children 20 metres up a gangplank
onto the ship at sea. The asylum seekers on board the sinking
boat had been drifting in the tropical heat for days and were
about to be sucked under the ocean when the giant 44,000 freighter
came alongside. Once on board the Norwegian ship the ill, injured
and desperate far outnumbered the crew of Norwegian officers and
Filipino ratings.
 |
| PHOTO: AP/Wilhelmsen Group |
A desperate mass of humanity huddled on deck among mountains of
containers under the tropical sun. Dehydration, dysentery, fevers,
cramps, heat exhaustion and hunger had taken their toll. Victims
of organised criminal syndicates operating out of Indonesia, these
people mainly Afghani, had handed over their life savings on the
promise of a safe journey and sanctuary in Australia. Victims
of persecution in their own land, victims of extortion and misinformation
on the high seas. Desperate they threatened suicide and worse
if the ship did not turn back to Australia.
"You know about the genocide and massacres going on in our country,"
the refugees later wrote to the Australian Government. "We have
no way but to run out of our dear homeland and to seek a peaceful
asylum... Why have we been deprived of refugee rights?"
Yet despite Australia calling on the Norwegian ship to take the
people on board, the Howard Government refused to allow the ship
to bring them ashore.
Australian seafarers attending the monthly stopwork meeting understood
too well the predicament of fellow seafarers aboard the Tampa.
Many had taken part in rescue missions themselves. The crew of
BHP freighter Iron Newcastle won an international medal for their
rescue of the Burmese crew from the sinking Panamanian MV Carolines
in January 1999.
The Federal Government was acting in contravention of maritime
law by shunning a ship and crew in distress.
Members of the MUA, condemned the actions of the government in
refusing to offer assistance to the besieged Norwegian freighter.
"Australian seafarers understand that it is a seafarer's responsibility
under the law of the sea to aid any person or persons in distress
at sea," said National Secretary Paddy Crumlin. "This is fundamental
to human rights and the application of international law."
By refusing assistance to the master and crew of the vessel the
Federal Government was opening the way for the international shipping
industry to turn their back on people or vessels in distress at
sea.
The MUA called on the Government to take urgent action to assist
the crew of the Tampa.
So too the International Transport Workers' Federation. ITF General
Secretary David Cockroft called on the Australian Government to
allow the Tampa to proceed to Christmas Island due to the unacceptable
risk to crew and asylum seekers. The ITF has also contacted the
International Maritime Organisation Secretary General William
O'Neill to urgently resolve the situation and put in place binding
international rules for such crisis.
But for PM John Howard it was an election year. Inflated with
small minded racist, xenophobic and parochial sentiments voiced
on talk back radio he denied the ship entry to Australian waters.
Racism was a vote winner.
On the world stage the drama about to unfold not only shocked
mariners the world over, it outraged the international community.
The Tampa was designed for a metal cargo not a human one. It was
not licensed to carry more than 30 passengers and its 27 crew.
It's toilet facilities life jackets, lifeboats, accommodation
and food provisions were inadequate. On day one the captain reported
15 people unconscious on its deck. One woman is eight months pregnant.
The crew could not cope without help
"I don't think we can hold out any longer," the ships radio operator
Mr Ramesh Iyengar said.
The crew issued a PAN PAN distress second only to May Day at 8pm
on August 28.
On Christmas Island community leaders were ready to welcome the
ship in port.
"Our community expresses sympathy for those who come to Christmas
Island seeking a safe haven from war, famine and oppressive regimes
in their countries of origin," the Union of Christmas Island Workers
said in a statement signed by community organisations and shire
councillors.
"The elected representatives of the people of Christmas Island
are ashamed of the actions of the PM of our country. We call upon
the Commonwealth of Australia to enter international agreements
aimed at providing an orderly system of accommodating asylum seekers
and refugees...."
They were ignored.
Captain Arne Rinnan aware of his rights under maritime law decided
to wait no longer. People were threatening to jump overboard if
no shore based medical treatment was forthcoming. The situation,
he said, was getting out of hand. After issuing a May Day, he
headed closer to port..
"Please be advised we are approaching Christmas Island to take
shelter," he radioed as he entered Australian waters at dawn on
August 29.
But again the PM's response was a brutal disregard of maritime
tradition, international convention and human decency.
Sniffing an opportunity to win votes on the eve of an election,
the PM ordered in the troops. They boarded carrying machine guns,
wearing helmets and face masks. A further 200 troops occupied
Christmas Island.
"Iron Fist" the Daily Telegraph applauded John Howard's Thatcherist
"firm stand".
"Shame on you Australia", the masters wife called from Norway.
"I think your PM is a hard man," Mrs Rinnan told The Telegraph.
"I don't' understand Australians. How can they live with themselves?"
Her husband, she explained was due to retire. He only had one
trip to go. He had been sailing since he was 15 and was one of
Wilhelmsen Lines senior masters.
The SAS storming of Tampa was a deplorable act. It was essentially
a military invasion of a friendly ship in peace time, the MUA
media release broadcast the next morning.
National Secretary Paddy Crumlin described the action of the Howard
Government as inappropriate, inhumane and deserving of international
condemnation.
"People smuggling has to be combated," he said. "But the perpetrators
are the ones who need to be targeted, not the innocent victims,
the master and crew of a vessel answering a distress call from
a sinking ship. Nor pregnant women and children. This is nothing
less than a cynical reelection gambit - Mr Howard's Falkland War."
(The Falklands members may recall was a war the Thatcher Government,
facing certain electoral defeat, drummed up in 1982 to win back
government.)
The next day the ITF warned the Australian Government that turning
away the vessel was illegal under international treaties to which
Australia is a signatory.
In a letter to the Australian Prime Minister ITF General Secretary
David Cockroft advised Howard that his Government was in clear
breach of the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention, the International
Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue, and the UN Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Finally the ITF warned the Australian Government that: "the unwanted
and unrequested occupation of the sovereign territory of Norway
- a friendly country - by Australian soldiers is dangerously irresponsible.
It is difficult to see how this, let alone any use of troops or
a frigate to turn around the Tampa, is anything less than a technical
act of war. Were it to have been carried out on the high seas,
rather than in territorial waters, there would be a good case
to be made for calling it piracy."
Then there were the moral issues, David Cockroft reminded Howard.
"Like it or not Australia must abide by its humanitarian duty
and accept these migrants. Until then it is endangering everyone
on board the Tampa - including the innocent crew members whose
only mistake appears to have been to respond responsibly and promptly
to an Australian call for assistance."
Outraged maritime lawyers, academics and immigration experts joined
the cries of condemnation.
They include Dr Michael White, QC, executive director of the Centre
of Maritime Law, University of Queensland, Professor Gillian Triggs,
International Law Department, University of Melbourne, international
law expert Professor Guy Goodwin-Gill of Oxford University, Dr
Sarah Derrington barrister in maritime commercial law, The International
Chamber of Shipping, The Baltic and International Maritime Council,
Robert Richter QC, Geneva United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights Mary Robinson, Amnesty International and Human Rights
Watch (HRW) refugee policy officer Rachael Rile.
"No one in the history ... recent history of international ship
owning would do what the Australian government's doing, you know.
Not one nation," Paddy Crumlin told national television that night.
"Because they understand that every country at every time is subject
to this type of refugee problem or ship in distress."
"Time to end the sorry saga", called the Australian Financial
Review, "PM's refugee bungling defies reason and decency," said
The Australian. "We must accept these stranded people on our shores."
Not before time Opposition leader Kim Beazley took a stand, with
Labor joining the Democrats and Greens in the Senate to block
draconian legislation enabling the Government to forceably remove
ships even those in distress, from Australian waters, including,
in effect, authorisation to shoot the captain.
The move was welcomed by ACTU President Sharon Burrow.
Then on Friday, August 31, the Federal Court granted an injunction
to the Victorian Council for Civil Liberties restraining the Government
from taking any steps to remove the Tampa from Australian waters.
The court heard that John Howard knowingly broke the law and acted
unconstitutionally by using shock troopers to block the Tampa
entering Australian waters and prevent the refugees seeking legal
representation.
On September 3 the Tampa was provisionally permitted to sail for
PNG, while the Federal Court hearings continued.
Norway reported Australia to the UN, branding us all inhumane
and in violation of international maritime rules which allow ships
to go the nearest port in an emergency, calling for a ban on Australian
wine imports. And Wilhelmson were warning of damages for the $30,000
a day the delay was causing the ship.
"I would not say anything if the ship was in the vicinity of a
banana republic," said Tampa owner Wallenius Wilhelmsen. "But
I mean this is supposed to be a civilised country."
Even our closest allies in the US and UK were shocked and mortified,
raising the ghost of the White Australia policy.
Why should we claim our country is 'swamped' with refugees when
last year Australia took only 12,713 applications compared to
the UK's 97,600 or the US's 1.2 million.
The United Nations too spoke out against the Australian stance.
But for the Maritime Union and its members, who can all too readily
identify with the crew and its human cargo, the Tampa is but another
sorry chapter in maritime policy under a Howard Government
"It's a catastrophic situation because the Federal Government
has cut itself adrift from the shipping industry," said MUA National
Secretary Paddy Crumlin. "Transport Minister John Anderson appears
to have no commitment or ability to understand shipping issues.
He's never employed anyone with any expertise or background in
shipping. Instead he relies on economic rationalists and ideologically
driven public servants like Feeney. The damage this is causing
to Australia's international standing is an inevitable outcome.
After five years of inaction, two reports never released and Anderson's
refrain that we are a shipper nation not a shipping nation, our
international standing is in tatters."
Crumlin said that the perception coming from international shipping
forums is that the Australian Government is incompetent in shipping
policy matters.
"The view from people in the ILO and the IMO is that Australia
is losing the plot," he said. "We've lost the solid reputation
developed over generations as a seafaring nation. Around the time
of the Ships of Shame parliamentary inquiries Australia was providing
leadership in world shipping reform, setting international benchmarks
in the law of the sea. Under the Howard Government this international
standing has all been squandered. It is an embarrassment to us
all.
"The question is," Crumlin asked. "How has this come about. If
it is merely ignorance or incompetence that's bad enough. If it
is bloody mindedness it is all the more scandalous."
In more than one way the Tampa debacle was eerily familiar to
maritime workers. Once again we have men and their families demonised
and attacked ('illegals, queue jumpers'), a pugnacious Peter Reith
ordering in the troops and Justice North of the Federal Court
handing down a injunction on the request of QC Julien Burnside.
And once again we have a community assembly of unionists, clergy
and civil rights activists taking a stand on high moral ground.
|